Abstract
In recent times, due to the rising number of arbitration cases dealing with cross-border disputes, the arbitration process has gained an international dimension. International commercial arbitration has transformed into a private transnational system for resolving disputes, encompassing various multilateral conventions, bilateral treaties, national arbitration regulations, as well as informal principles and rules for dispute resolution. This comprehensive article explores the landscape of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) mechanisms, focusing on Uzbekistan's jurisdictional perspective and comparing it with international practices. It examines legislative reforms, technological implementations, and challenges associated with ODR adoption. The article provides valuable insights into the evolution of ODR and its potential to enhance access to justice.
References
Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Mediation // https://lex.uz/docs/-3805227
United Nations Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation (Singapore Convention) - https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/mediation/conventions/international_settlement_agreements
Online Dispute Resolution: An International Benchmark – https://imimediation.org/
E-commerce Dispute Resolution in the United States and Europe: Lessons for the Future – Stanford Law Review// https://conferences.law.stanford.edu/codr2013/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2016/09/Katsh-Wahab-ODR-A-Lok-at-History-Ch.1.pdf
Online Dispute Resolution in Cross-Border E-commerce Transactions: A Comparative Analysis of Regulatory Approaches in China and the European Union - Journal of International Arbitration // https://law-store.wolterskluwer.com/s/product/journal-of-international-arbitration-print/01t4R00000OirlJQAR
The European ODR Platform - European Commission // https://ec.europa.eu/consumers/odr/main/?event=main.home2.show
The Singapore International Mediation Centre (SIMC) - https://simc.com.sg/
I Rustambekov, M Bakhramova, Legal Concept and Essence of Intеrnаtionаl Arbitrаtiоn;
F. SANDER, “Varieties of Dispute Processing”, FRD 1976, afl. 70, 111-123;
G. KAUFMANN-KOHLER and T. SCHULTZ, ODR, supra note 2, 6 (under note 6, referring to L. NADER, No access to law: Alternatives to the American legal system, New York, Academic Press, 1980, 540 p.);
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.